Over the years, I've had
numerous individual's come to me that were interested in learning
something that I happened to teach. In relation to the
martial arts, that's usually been (either) RyuTe®
or Shuji/Shodo. They
tend to do so, because I have a Yudansha
ranking in both of
those subjects, and both
are from respected organizations.
Personally,
I've never been impressed by “Rank” (in this
case, meaning a level of Yudansha
/“Black-Belt” grading). When I was a kid,
yeah. But once I got past 16 (or so), the whole “Dan”
thing began to look a little fishy.
That
opinion hasn't really changed
much over the years either. The Dan
system, was originally intended to indicate an acquired amount of
knowledge, skill or
even time that was
obtained from one's involvement within a particular
system/methodology of study.
Having
been involved with several (different) systems of martial arts, those
beliefs have been dis-proven
time and again. The only time I've found it (the “Dan” system) to
be a useful reference,
has been in/for Japanese Calligraphy (Shuji/Shodo).
My
RyuTe®
student's are instructed to address me by my first name.
There's numerous reasons
for my having them do so, but mainly,
it stem's from the fact that I disagree
with the superiority
implications that are being made with the use
of the aforementioned title's.
This
doesn't mean that I don't teach (and expect)
our students to utilize those titles for non/outside of our Dojo
person's. To myself (and from my own observations), titles
can become a passive
form of intimidation
(and are very often
used in non-passive/ie.
Aggressive and/or
Dominating manners as
well).
I
also disagree with the expectation
of (unwarranted) respect.
There is a level of (general)
respect, that should
be presented to all
individual's (IMO). I feel that it's (also) those
individual's responsibility
to do the same for
myself. That respect should only be negated,
because of any actions perpetrated by that individual.
I
believe that there are some
individual's, that (actually) believe
that by proclaiming that they
have (such and such)
ranking, that they
deserve a greater
amount of respect (than the average
individual, or the lowliest
“kyu-ranked” student).
To
that end, it has become (ever) increasingly popular to promote one's
“self” (or to have
their close friends do so for
them, so as to feign legitimacy)
to ever higher levels
of rank.
Whether
one believes it or not
(LOL), I'm not
directing this at any particular individual's.
This situation is rampant throughout
the industry. As I've stated before, I was ecstatic
when Taika did away with the different Yudansha
belts (having either none worn w/the hakama,
or only by an unadorned “Black” belt).
It
is the first thing I notice when viewing another system's website. I
see the different belt color's, stripes (of different colors/number)
patches and all manner of
“pimping-out” done to one's belt and Gi/Hakama (kind of reminds
you of being at a “stock-car” race, just not
as exciting).
Personally,
I'd like to see the awarding of rank,
being based upon something besides
(or even in addition
to) having the required funds
(available) to pay for
something that will return nothing
(or very little) to you in (real) “life”.
Obtaining
the rank of Shodan,
commonly entitles you to teach kyu-rank (Mudansha) requirements to
new student's. It doesn't (really) establish or confirm much more
than that alone.
Beyond that level, the Yudansha
ranks are very (very)
vague on what they
supposedly require for
consecutive rankings (aside from the testing fee's).
As
it stands now (for most
systems), the only people who can
test for a Yudansha
rank (which would include Shodan),
are those who have the
money to blow
on this luxury item.
And whether one want's it or not,
as the present system
is set-up, only those
with money will be
allowed to be of any
(higher) Yudansha
rankings.
To some degree, rumor has it that the new RyuTe® board will be addressing that situation, and if so, I would applaud them for their attempts at doing so.
This is a problem, that has been present for (at least) the previous 35/40 years (here in the U.S.). That problem, when coupled with the “fast-food/Strip-mall” mentality of/for training, has turned training in the martial arts, into only being a marketing challenge (for the owner, instead of a learning challenge for the student).
This is a problem, that has been present for (at least) the previous 35/40 years (here in the U.S.). That problem, when coupled with the “fast-food/Strip-mall” mentality of/for training, has turned training in the martial arts, into only being a marketing challenge (for the owner, instead of a learning challenge for the student).
Training
(IMO), should be a regular teaching challenge
(for the instructor)
to create evermore
proficient and knowledgeable student's.
Simply being a “model” for your student's, is self-defeating for
the art, and the
industry as a whole.
If
your student's are not
turning out better
than yourself (or at least more proficiently trained), you are (only) providing a disservice
to (both) your
student's, and to your
art. As the saying goes, "Shape up, or Ship out*", LOL
(*or at least stop pretending to be an instructor)
No comments:
Post a Comment