When I find myself
involved in discussions about the application of kyusho (types
of) strikes, I'm usually confronted with the counter argument
of they can't/won't work on whomever or where ever
(for whatever reasons).
There are (of course)
numerous types of these kyusho strikes, as well as the
various manner's of their application. These strikes could be used
upon an aggressor's arm's, leg's and/or body. There is no
universal manner of application (that would be used for every
manner of kyusho type of strike that could be made).
Using the popular neck
strike (as an example), I can
easily demonstrate 6 (or more) different
manner's of striking (either) side of an aggressor's neck (upon the
same location). Each
of these strikes would elicit a different
manner of response.
Depending upon which
of these manner's are used, will determine what the recipient's
reaction will be (from the applied strike). Too often (IMO),
people assume that the “correct” response will be the
infamous knock-out. Though it would be nice for that to
be true, it's not realistic to (automatically) expect
it to happen.
The more common and
(frankly) to be expected response will be a dazed
reaction. This will usually last anywhere from only a few seconds,
to a couple of minute's. Though not nearly as visually
dramatic, a physically dazed aggressor is incapable of
effecting a serious counter-strike upon the defender.
Despite the expressed
desire/wish that someone (meaning Me, LOL) post a full
and clear explanation of how to perform a “knock-out”
strike, it isn't as easy to do as one would (at first) believe
it to be. Many of the subtleties of application are difficult to
convey (even when done in person).
The “Other”
part of these strikes that I find most entertaining (when
watching the various snake-oil /TCM idiot's) is their recovery
(?) techniques that are
used upon the recipient (in response to having received some manner
of kyusho “knock-out” application). These are especially
amusing to watch when/if the (supposed) knock-out is a
result of a blood-flow interruption (type of) strike.
Even a simplistic
knowledge of basic first-aid, would show these moron's
performing self-defeating and counter-productive
motions upon these (unlucky) recipient's (of those applied
neck-strikes).
First off, you
don't set one of these (unlucky) recipient's “up” (on
their ass), with their leg's folded in front of them.
This is (medically) the exact opposite of what you do
with someone who has received one of these type's of strikes.
The majority of these
strikes, create a blood-flow irregularity (at least as
perceived by the recipient's brain). The
recovery/first-aid response to this type of situation, is to
lay the victim down and elevate the feet (reference any
first-aid manual). The recipient's response (to being struck), is
essentially one most akin to feinting (a
perceived lack of
blood-flow to/from the
brain, by the brain).
There is no need to
strike the victim
(again) on any opposite-side
(or anywhere else,
this is being done for dramatic if
not theatrical effect).
By
making the recipient remain upright
(and sitting cross-legged)
the effects of the
strike are actually being intensified
and/or prolonged.
The moron's that
endorse these “recovery” methods, are nothing but idiots,
and should be avoided
by any serious practitioner.
The biggest difference
between the manner that Taika strikes a subject (for a knock-out
and/or dazing result), and how the mimic's perform
their strikes, is in finesse. Taika's strikes were
always performed in a relaxed manner, and with a nonchalance
that made it look easy (which until one understands the manner
the strikes are performed, is rarely the case, LOL). If/when
one watches the imitator's, they are commonly slamming
the recipient (of the technique) with a disturbing amount of
force.
Having been on the
receiving end of numerous examples of Taika's strikes,
each felt as though his finger's (or toe's) were pieces
of re-bar and his arm's or
leg's had the force of a speeding truck.
The amount of power
that Taika was able to generate (without appearing
to expend any effort
at all) was phenomenal.
What
is often (if not additionally)
misunderstood, is that
not every kyusho
point/location is utilized for an impact
(type/manner of technique). Some, can be just creepy
to utilize (depending on your level of acceptance and/or comfort).
The ability to plunge
a finger into a body cavity,
twist a finger-tip around a vein
or tendon, and then
pluck it (like a
guitar string), is an acquired level
of comfort (that not everyone
can come to terms with).
When
utilized in even a slow,
controlled and
non-aggressive manner
for example/demonstration
purposes, observer's often experience an uneasy
feeling or sensation during
the example. It's during these demonstrations that students will
acquire the understanding, that these techniques and applications are not
for cheap parlor tricks
at parties. These techniques cause serious,
debilitating (if not
deadly) damage
to the recipient.
It's these types of strikes/attacks, that a student needs to be (more) careful if not hesitant in practicing (as well as applying). People become overly concerned with/about the neck (type/manner of) strikes. Most often their concern is centered around the fact that they (the strikes) are being performed with excessive force.
There is NO reason for this to be the case. More force (of impact), is not the answer to correcting an improperly applied technique. Blatantly striking one another on the neck, is not how to learn to apply these (types of) strikes (and could easily be equated to being stupid, LOL).
When first learning to utilize these types of techniques, the student should only focus on (simple) directional body responses (from the strikes). In numerous posts, I've listed the general application rules for performing these (simplistic) manners of striking.
Once the student is comfortable with creating these directional responses, they can begin to (carefully, LOL) work on the strikes that cause the dazing effect. Although everyone seems to strive for it (as if it's the only acceptable response), achieving a knock-out response, is not always necessary, or required.
No comments:
Post a Comment