I just finished watching
a person demonstrate (their version) of performing an arm-bar.
That was the most pathetic excuse for a application, much less
the ground-pin (using an arm-bar) that I've ever seen.
The various methods of application that he taught (for applying and
using one) were equally pathetic.
Of the collection of
tripe that he piled on the technique, I only saw 1 application
that had any merit (at all). What he spent 10 minutes
demonstrating, we teach in about 5, and ours will work
(unlike his).
He had his uke
demonstrate how easy it is to escape (his) version of
the (straight arm) arm-bar application, yet (evidently) didn't
know how to correct his version to prevent the
escape from occurring (sad).
I found it particularly
interesting that he was using data from nearly 20 years ago,
on how to apply an arm-bar. First off, he was attempting to
apply it with the suspects arm bent (at the elbow). I believe
that he thought this offered the tori the ability (for some
unknown reason) to move the suspect/uke around.
This isn't the
purpose of an arm-bar. It's main (and most would argue only)
purpose, is to lever the suspect/uke to the ground. For L.E.
Applications, this is usually to apply handcuffs, and sometimes
temporarily restrain the suspect/uke.
I found it equally
interesting that he indicated that pressure upon the triceps
muscle (?) was what (he believed) was forcing the
suspect/uke to the ground. I suppose if your big enough,
that might be a reasonable assumption (though not
particularly practical, or effective).
Of course I'm already
aware that arm pressure points don't work (at
least according to this
individual, LOL). But this guy also promotes
the use of TCM in his
form of martial arts (huh?, whatever). Evidently he doesn't know that
much about that aspect
of it either.
As
I stated, he does use
1 particular ground
pin/lock that we
utilize (except for how
he hold's the suspect/uke's hand). Beyond that, his
information of what the uke is capable
of doing, is a shining example
of how poorly he's
able to apply a basic
floor pin.
In
our practice of the application of an Arm-Bar, we begin with the uke
having their arms at their sides. The tori will approach the uke, and
place both hand's on either side of the same shoulder/upper arm.The
tori will then slide both hand's down the uke's arm until both are
grasping the uke's wrist.
The
tori then releases their hand that is closest to the uke (if the tori
is on the uke's Left side, it would be the tori's Right hand). That
hand will raise up the uke's arm until positioned slightly above the
uke's elbow. The back of that hand's forearm will apply light
pressure against the uke's upper arm.
While
the close hand is positioning, the hand which has hold of the uke's
wrist will circle away, then to the front of the uke. The held wrist
will motion the thumb of that hand into the groin (area) of the uke.
As the uke's arm is placed against the uke's body, the tori's
near-hand (which is laying against the uke's upper arm) will maintain
pressure against that arm (as if pinning the uke's upper arm to their
side).
The
tori's hand which is grasping the uke's wrist, will then be raised
using their arm (that
is pinning the uke's upper arm to their side) as a fulcrum.
The arm being raised, is (obviously) the lever. What
is more commonly (and incorrectly)
done, is the person will attempt to apply pressure
to the back of the uke's upper
arm (in the attempt to force
them to lean over).
As
long as the tori is larger and stronger than the uke, they might
be forced over (though doubtful).
Additionally, the uke will usually only bend forward at their waist.
If the tori's pressure is insufficient,
They will often stand right back up.
When applied correctly, the uke's knee's will buckle
(further assisting in a
controlled take-down).
As
I've stated before, this is the most miss-applied
technique performed by our (new) students (who happen to be) Law
Enforcement Officer's. It also happens to be the most
used control manipulation used by every officer that I've
ever met and/or trained.
It's
not that it's a bad technique, only that the training officer's
really SUCK at teaching their officer's how
to apply it (as well as not realizing themselves what
it is, that they're doing wrong).
I've noticed of late, that it's become popular (amongst L.E.
Officer's) to participate in various “physical fitness” programs
(“P-90” being one that comes to mind, my son the K.C.P.D. Sargent
has done that one). These programs do
make the officer bigger
and stronger, but that
doesn't mean that poorly
performed techniques will work (regardless
of how big/strong the
officer becomes).
I
find it (somewhat) amusing to see how (training) things come full
circle. In the 70's there were minimum height/weight requirements to
even get on the
average P.D. The techniques that were taught to officer's back then
were often based on the premiss
that the officer would be bigger/stronger
than the majority of suspects.
Those
height/weight requirements have been radically
reduced, so now the
officer is rarely the
largest person in a confrontation. This should dictate a more
stringent adherence to proper training methods, but alas, I only see
Bigger instructor's
being placed in those training positions.
When
those same
instructor's use the kind of methods that I've described above, their
job is going to be much
more difficult (and the officer's much less safe,
and/or efficient at
their job).
No comments:
Post a Comment