With the recent changes
made within the RyuTe association, it's difficult to evaluate the
direction that it will proceed in. I have been impressed with
the amount of knowledge (exercises, weapon's kata, kyusho
knowledge, open-hand kata) that has been archived for the
association's use/reference.
It will now be up to the
membership, and the appointed leadership (whomever that may
be) to decide if RyuTe Renmei will persevere, or be a passing
note in history. I'm sure that many won't see fit to leave the
association until the first of next year (Jan. 2013), that's when the
yearly association dues are expected (not that everyone has
been paying anyhow, yes,...we have numerous free-loader's.
They're commonly identified by the amount of whining they do).
It's my own
understanding, that (supposedly) numerous “things” are to
be decided at this years summer camp (in progress as I'm writing
this). Until those decisions are made, it's all up in the
air.
For anyone not
affiliated with the association, (I'm sure) this is a very
boring subject. For those of us that are though,
what's decided will determine the direction and manner of
future student instruction.
I have (my own)
suspicion's, that what-ever is decided (at summer-camp), will
be modified numerous times before the first of the year.
Frankly, very few of these people are familiar with how
to run a business (much less an association), or to do
so in the “family” manner that Taika wanted it to be
(not that he was always able to do so either, LOL).
My own “opinion”
(which yes, I know nobody gives a flippin' F%&k
about) is that anyone who runs a school/dojo full-time
should be excluded from any position of
authority/control. Decision's should be made by a
committee/group (not by any sole individual).
Rank, should be
based on time spent in the association (otherwise, it's
only the people who can afford to test, that will/can).
It still would be, but that would limit (if not
eliminate) the “suddenly” high-ranked student's (that have
hardly any time in the association, yet have been able to
purchase a high rank, and too often as being
their first one that they acquire when joining the association).
Doing so, might also
eliminate/avoid the current problem of “too many chiefs,
with not enough Indians” (not
to mention, some of
those “chiefs” have less
“time” in the association than numerous
Indians). As with nearly every single system that I've
observed or been affiliated with, those of higher “rank” are not
(necessarily) any more (or less) talented/knowledgeable than
anyone else.
Again, IMO... If someone
requires recognition for their knowledge/ability in some
particular aspect of RyuTe (for which I could name numerous
individual's that would qualify), then those
individual's should have certification(s) that state what that
knowledge is (otherwise, it's only here-say). This
would (help) eliminate the internal/personal “bickering” that is
prevalent in every group/association (as well as make it more
convenient for those seeking whom to contact for
instruction in that subject).
Looking at Every
Single Member Who Has Been Kicked Out Of The RyuTe
Association, They Have Promoted Themselves to Higher
Ranks (than they earned while still in RyuTe). And They ALL Still
Attempt to Profit off of Taika's name.
I believe we
(as an association) need to get away from the addiction
to (ever) higher ranking. A (more accurate?) indication
of knowledge/ability would be recognition of an individual's
knowledge/ability through subject certification by/through the
organization. If the organization has credibility,
then the certification does also.
Being able to present
certification's (from a reputable association/group) carries
greater respect than simply stating that (in your
opinion) you think that your really, really good
(and/or that your buddies think so too).
I (personally) would feel
much greater respect about
receiving a certificate that stated that I (actually) had a
particular skill/ability
(rather than an arbitrary “rank”, that usually isn't recognized
by any other system/school). It's much easier to prove
a particular ability/skill,
than it is to prove
(or even justify)
one's placement within an established hierarchy
(especially a position of
authority).
But (again, LOL), I'm Nobody.
No comments:
Post a Comment