When I began my study of
RyuTe, there were dozen's of new concepts and ideas that I had to get
my head wrapped around. Many of those concepts had been
(weakly) mentioned in some of the other systems that I had previously
toyed with, but none presented them as something that every
student would be working on/with (almost immediately), regardless
of their rank.
One of the most popular
of those subjects, was Kyusho. Many students (myself
included), attempted to organize what Taika was showing us (in
regards to their locations and applications). Sadly, this often
became a Cluster-f*%k operation.
Numerous locations could be used for multiple
purposes depending on how
they were manipulated (direction, type
of impact/pressure, whether the location was being flexed
or relaxed, etc.).
There were numerous variables to almost every
instance of a locations use! What made it worse, was that if the
wrong manner was used
in an inappropriate situation, there would be little
to no reaction.
Taika
never really stressed any particular general
manner of kyusho application. Locations were shown/taught as they
became applicable to what application we were working on (at the
time). This meant that a kyusho location could be (only) mentioned
(in passing), or
studied specifically
depending on what that
classes emphasis was that night.
Much
like our Tuite Principles,
all of the relevant
points were not presented/mentioned at same
time. They had to be collected
through the attendance of numerous
classes. Individual's who only studied for short
periods of time, were never
exposed to Taika's entire
instructional method (which is why long-term students
of Taika dismiss those
wanna-be pretender's
as being fraud's and charlatan’s).
The
collection of general application
rules, was awkward in several (application)
respects. Teaching a location, Only
for the purpose of knowing to strike/use
that location, seemed to be counter-productive,
as well as counter-defensive.
It tended to encourage student's to attempt to strike only
those locations. Not every location produces a usable
reaction unless additional
factors are also in
effect.
If
a particular location on the forearm (of an aggressor) is struck when
that aggressor's arm is relaxed
(and not striking), the reaction will be little,
if any. When that same
location is struck as that aggressor is attempting to strike
the Tori, that aggressor will be dropped to their knee's
(and their strike nullified).
But,
OMG!!! they weren't knocked-out!
and that's what all
kyusho points are used for! (uh, not so much). Many kyusho locations
cause/create less than
(that particular
manner of) dramatic responses. That doesn't make them less useful,
only that their use is often dictated by the situation
(not necessarily by the user's intent).
It
should be remembered, Kyusho means vital-point.
Vital, is a relative
term, what's (actually) “Vital” depends on what
one needs to accomplish.
What this means, is that although we'd all like to believe
that we would (just) Knock-Out
an aggressor, unless the situation allows
for it to be able to
occur, it probably won't (sigh).
This in turn, mandates that our other
defensive skills be proficient as well. It's in those regards that
knowledge of kyusho/atemi locations becomes more applicable.
A
great deal of noise is
made in regards to multiple
locations being (required to be) struck, in order to effect any
result, this is nonsense.
I've both watched and received
one of Taika's strikes (that have resulted in either a KO, or a numb
(as in “dead”) limb. In either case he only implemented a single
striking action.
We
have our own student's practice arm strikes on a regular basis. Even
though performed lightly,
only limited contact practice can be attempted (before they painfully
choose to change the technique their working on).
Having
read several (different) theories about kyusho locations, I've never
completely agreed with
any one of them (singularly). I've found a combination of several
of them to be closer to my own experience and knowledge.
First
and foremost, is the complete dismissal
of any/all “KI/Chi,
Meridian” nonsense.
None of it applies, works or explains any
of it. That Shit is
only being used to
suck-in gullible
moron's that are
unwilling to investigate
the subject for themselves. The understanding of the human
neurological system is a tremendous
undertaking, and one that I (certainly)
make no claims to of
mastered (at all).
That
being said, it doesn't mean that it's impossible
for the (only moderately
educated) average
person to be able to understand the basics, or at least with a little
effort on their part,
LOL. The RyuTe association has several doctor's (medical specialists)
who are able to
explain the physical/neurological reasons
for the reactions caused/created by the strikes that Taika is
teaching to us. Taika himself, doesn't know (or care).
He say's it doesn't matter.
As long as you know that if you do
“A”, it will result
in “B”, then he doesn't care
what “A” is doing.
The only thing that's important,
is “B”.
I
am exposed to the meridian tripe
on a regular basis (I receive multiple E-mails daily). Every
one of them, exert more mental and physical effort
on any one
application, than I would consider necessary
for students to use for an entire confrontation.
What they consider to
be “Tuite”, is re-hashed
jujutsu techniques that can (many times) be easily countered.
Is
what I teach/use the answer? That's debatable, the difference being,
that I'm willing to change
my methodology if/when what I'm doing is proven wrong
(to me). It's not like
I haven't done so in the past, that
was what got me involved with RyuTe 34 years ago.
1 comment:
Dillman hadem going till he started talking about no touch knockouts, that was so ridiculous that he was completely was discredited.
Made his crooked money though:))
Loner
Post a Comment