When I first began
studying Shito-Ryu, my instructor had made passing mention that when
I began to teach (my own) students, that I should always refrain from
telling them everything, I should keep something in
reserve for myself.
I would hope, that
this comes across as being as freaking paranoid to everyone
else, as it did to me. I understood his intention
(at the time), but I still didn't agree with it. If anything,
it prompted me to do the opposite! I attempt to show my
student's everything that I know (as soon as their able to
understand it anyway, LOL).
I have to presume that he
had constant concerns over his student's “challenging” him? (who
knows). He taught in Kansas City at a time when Martial Arts was a
big business (early-mid “70's”). It was common for
competing schools to (physically) Beat an instructor
out-of-business.
Somehow the whole idea
that a student, would be able (or would even want) to
challenge their instructor just seems, ...childish? To
me, it sounds (more) like the instructor had some really poor
judgment skills when accepting students, and frankly,
Who wins that argument? If the instructor wins a confrontation
(as you would presume them to), so what? (they defeated a
student, LOL). Their
judgment in students is now
in question. If the student wins,
does that imply that the teacher must Really
be good? Or that the instructor sucks?
(uh, but he taught the
student?). In any
event, not something I
concern myself with.
The
(only recent) revival
in the study/research of kata, has placed the spotlight upon the fact
that many (if not most) systems don't really know
what their kata motions represent. Could this
(in fact) be a result of this withholding information
attitude?
The
idea that withholding knowledge should even be considered, is (to
myself) an idea that guarantees a
martial art system to become terminal.
With that sort of
mentality, there's no other
option for the system.
Given only a dozen generations of student's, the system would have
numerous “gaps” in it's instruction (hmm...sound familiar?).
Not
to be confusing, but
not withholding
information, doesn't
mean that a student is told everything
(all at once). That would actually prove to be a counter-productive
gesture. Too much detail/information (very) often will only be seen
(by the student) as being confusing.
In
hind-site, I believe my Shito-Ryu instructor was lacking (in
many regards, LOL) in his instructional knowledge. When
I began my study with Taika, I would ask numerous questions. He
answered a great many of them until (I believe) he got sick of
hearing me, LOL, and told me to study the kata (to find
my own answers).
When
I would believe that I had discovered some tid-bit of knowledge, I
would present it to Taika, who would either confirm it or turn and
shake his head in disgust while walking away from me (yes, that
happened a LOT, LOL).
I was
watching the “I am Bruce Lee” movie recently, and I was listening
to these various people comment about him, and the things that he
said and did. Some I agreed with (a lot I didn't), but the majority
of what he (Mr. Lee) attempted to do, was erase the
self-imposed barrier's between systems/styles (he was fervently
against “styles”).
When
I first began my training with Taika, one thing he always emphasized,
was that all systems were the same. He preferred that you had
studied an Okinawan or Japanese (same thing) style when you started
with him (less changes to be made in what/how you did things).
In
Taika's viewpoint, it didn't matter what system you studied. You were
a human being. Your body could only move in a specific manor.
Regardless of what system you trained in, you still could only move
in that manner. Your bodies weaknesses were the same as anybody else.
In
many ways, what Taika taught, was exactly what Bruce Lee was always
talking about. I've also been present when Taika was asked about
Bruce Lee. Taika kind of shrugged his shoulder's and said “he was
an actor, I see nothing special”. I have also seen Taika perform
(his own version of?) the 1” punch, and explain how it's
done (he used to do it regularly at seminars, LOL).
Of
the multitudes of people that I have watched come and go from Taika's
tutelage, the trait that has proven most successful, is that
of patients. Taika has never been one to get in a hurry (with
much of anything, LOL). His claim, is that we
(westerner's) are too slow to pick-up on what he is trying to
convey to us.
From
my own exposure (to him), I would have to (reluctantly) agree.
Every single time that he has revealed some earth-changing
parcel of information, his claim has been that he has always
done it that way (but we never picked up on it). There's
always those who wish to claim that it's just not so,
that he has just kept it secret, that he doesn't want anyone
else to figure it out.........Bullshit.
I
have copies of Video shot in the mid-late 70's (and yes, I've
specifically looked), he DID always do those things, and NO we
just didn't pick-up on it. Taika doesn't restrict information
from what he's teaching, he just doesn't shove it up your ass
(like you'd like him to) in order for you to understand
it.
I
truly believe that Taika does some of it on purpose to
weed-out a number of the dingle-berry's that aren't
quite up to snuff! (which was proven by the exodus of the last
group of thieves who were purged). He's been forced (by those
individual's actions) to empty the association of those whom
don't wish to learn what (and how) he has chosen to convey his
knowledge unto his student's.
Taika
teaches by example, this is a concept that is only moderately
understood today. The practitioner's of today, are too involved with
obtaining their next “Dan-Rank” so they can rename
themselves SUPREME ROOSTER VACUME/SWALLOWER (or something).
Westerner's
have (once again, sigh...) proven that they are Lazy.
We want it all handed to us (on a silver plate, with a side of wine).
When I tell my own students, to work on something for a week,
you'd of thought I just proclaimed a life-sentence upon them,
LOL.
The
really sad part (IMO), is that it isn't that Taika makes
anybody do anything (too outrageous) out of the
ordinary. Very often, simple observation, and consideration
of the presented situation/problem can lead one to the answer
that they seek (then on to the next conundrum, LOL).
No comments:
Post a Comment