There
are numerous groups throughout the Martial Arts community, that
promote the fact that they emphasize
that their student's are often required
to study TCM (traditional Chinese medicine). They base this reasoning
upon the belief that one must be knowledgeable of TCM's meridian
lines/points in order to exploit/utilize them for defensive purposes.
If
one hasn't figured out by now that
“I " don't
subscribe to this drivel (#1 your stupid),
then you haven't really been paying attention. That choice was not
made (solely) from any outside
influences, but from my own research
into it's applicability (to what I teach/Do).
Keeping
in mind that even a stopped
watch is correct twice
a day, TCM similarly has individual portions which do contain a level
of validity to them. The infamous “meridian lines” are regularly
miss-used by these
groups, but they excuse themselves
by stating that they're
only using them as a general reference
source (?). Really?, when was the last time you had someone perform
acupuncture in a general
location upon you? (And if so, then why don't you just buy a chart
with all the point locations and do it yourself?)
I've
(actually,
LOL) Read
“The Web that has no Weaver”, and it's cohort, “Book of the 5
Elements” , Both amounted to being More philosophical
than practical, they only
covered acupuncture
theory, and
barely
mentioned herbs
and physical
therapy (Both
of which, are a major
part of Chinese Medicine that never
get mentioned). Both books also Give
Western medicine short
shrift, and exaggerates
the abilities of Chinese medicine in general. The numerous
contradictions and generalities made in these books should
be enough to make even the most devout
pupil, skeptical of their contents.
These
texts could only be
used as general references,
because there is NO
consistency to either
of them. They are both
filled with redundant inconsistency’s
and contradictions
that make any attempts to apply rules (that
could be followed for their inclusion), impossible.
These
texts, are the framework for charlatans
to build their structures of deceit upon.
They were never intended for the applications that are repeatedly
being applied to them. Acupuncture, (in general) is a Healing
art. It possesses NO teachings of (intentional) harm.
The so-called “Cycle of Destruction” was NOT intended for
application of (any) martial art system (it is intended to be an
explanation of the bodies
ability to breakdown the equivalency of infections and such).
TCM
did NOT gain it's popularity because of martial arts, it became
popular because of it's (limited) use of drugs. That fact
also is the reason why it became less
and less popular to begin
with (Western medicine could very often actually CURE you, not just
make you feel good).
Does
that mean that it's all fake?
No, (not in my opinion
anyway). For treating, and even aiding in healing certain afflictions, I think it can prove quite
helpful, just NOT for martial arts.
It
baffles me, why these
individual's would believe
this nonsense. The fact that you strike a particular location (and
create a result) does
Not equate to
validating all the
other nonsense that
these guy's are pushing.
The
only answer that I can establish, is that these individual's have no
other excuses to use
that would justify their own inability
to perform the required actions. If they can make it confusing
(enough) then they can point in several
directions when they screw-up
whatever it is they're doing (or at least attempting
to do, LOL).
I'm
aware that there are a few RyuTe member's that actually pursue this
stupidity (and they have my apathetic sympathy). By doing so, those
individual's have completely abandoned Taika's teachings, and will
become trapped in the bottomless (and answer-less)
pit that is this
direction of practice.
What
their reason for doing so might actually be,
is beyond my own understanding. I abandoned that direction of study
(over) 20yrs. Ago, and my practice has only
progressed since
having done so.
I've
mentioned (granted, only in passing) the isolationist
attitude that would seem to be
appearing in a few of the (individual) RyuTe schools. It's my
own opinion, that this is what
lead to the more recent dismissal's
of some of those RyuTe member's/schools.
Virtually
All of those
schools/instructor's forbid or
at least convinced
their (yudansha) students that there was no point
for them to attend Taika's classes (not
that they did so
either, LOL).
With
the passing of Tashi Logue, the Association Guideline Manual (for
Dojo Owners) is being rewritten (a long overdue task). Numerous Dojo
owners aren't even aware
that they are out of compliance.
That should soon be rectified (or at least they will be aware of being so,
in order to correct it).
I
believe we're all entitled
to make mistakes (or
at least, poor/ignorant choices).
I believe the real
question is, will we recognize
the difference between what's right,
and what isn't.
For
those that were removed/expelled from the Association, I've seen the
reasons for their having been done so. Despite the numerous
Half-truths and Lies
that have been presented by/for those individual's to gain sympathy,
they (definitely) don't deserve any.
Of course human nature being what it is, there's always somebody looking to capitalize off of the efforts of others. Usually, it's a student's gullibility that's being exploited. But Unfortunately, that can also include ignoring the provision of Recognition, when it's actually due.
This association has always had guidelines to be followed by it's member's. Though not everyone was always aware of those guidelines, it has always been a simple matter to ask. Too often, it's just been easier (and more profitable) to just assume that what will be financially more profitable for yourself is correct, and ignore anything that might work against that belief.
It's that same premiss (money), which is the major motivator for the TCM nonsense. If your skill, or abilities are so lacking, that you have to resort to this tripe, then maybe it's time you quit (claiming to teach) martial arts.
1 comment:
The best book I ever read on acupuncture was written by a man with impressive credentials: a Western MD who had become intrigued by acupuncture and went to the trouble of actually learning Chinese so he could read the texts in the original language, became certified, and actually did some experimentation. The thing that sticks in my mind years after having read the book? He said he explicitly rejected acupuncture's theoretical basis and said that in his opinion, it worked by means, mostly, of the parasympathetic nervous system, when it DID work, which it didn't always.
Post a Comment