"Chaos is the law
of nature;
Order
was the dream of man."
(“Unknown”)
Over the years it has
always confounded me, that students feel that every motion
must be performed in a symmetrical manner (whether Left or
Right). I repeatedly see the same theme/idea being
presented (in their training methods) when done by a (and really,
any) martial art system.
With these ideal's in
mind, Symmetry is not always a preferred manner of
practice. In truth, every person has a dominate side. They are
(usually) either Right/Left Handed. A very few may be (somewhat)
ambidextrous, but even they will have preferred “sides”
for doing various motions/actions.
Although it would
(obviously) be beneficial for the student to practice using both
sides (arms/hands/legs) of their body, we stress that they
(initially) emphasize the use of only 1-side, when beginning
their training with us (that being their dominant-side).
For our transitional
students (that have experience in other systems) this
seems to be a huge task to overcome. The majority of RyuTe's
reasoning for doing so, comes from the fact that the defensive motion
is performed the same regardless of the aggressor's choice of
side (whether they use their
Right or Left hand).
It's
always (entertaining?) interesting watching transitional student's
begin to implement RyuTe techniques with (simple) striking assaults.
It requires a lot of practice to un-learn
the habits of their prior instruction.
This
is also the most difficult
for people with other training to understand (without being
shown/demonstrated in person). In RyuTe, we don't have separate
responses for Left/Right punches. It's (usually) the exact same
motion (performed by the one
side) regardless. Symmetry,
is not a relevant
issue. The focus, is on the defensive motion (not
the aggressor's action), the response will function regardless
of the aggressor's choice of Left/Right.
I
believe that a lot of this symmetry of motion
nonsense, has been reinforced by the meridian-line crap
that's been pushed over the last few years. These meridian theory's
are ridicules when being applied to the martial arts, if you want to
disprove them, all you
have to do is look at an anatomy diagram. The human body is NOT
(internally) symmetrical
(yet, the meridian lines are?).
There are numerous (Western) medical fields that have FAR more
relation to what we're doing in
RyuTe (or any martial
art for that matter),
than these idiots that are pushing the TCM Crap.
Symmetry,
is not natural. Look
at Japanese gardening
(how's that for appearing to change subjects!, LOL). They are never
constructed
symmetrical, this is done to emulate nature (which
also, is never symmetrical). Many actions often appear to be
symmetrical, but aren't (really).
Take
walking (for example),
although it appears
that each foot/leg performs an equal
motion, it's (well) known, that when lost in a desert/forest, if one
takes off walking, they will inevitably wind-up walking in a (often
large) circle. This is because both legs do not
make equal lengths of
step. They are not making symmetrical motions.
These
differences throughout the entire body, come about for numerous
reasons, some simple,
and some require reams
of documentation to explain. RyuTe only utilizes the most simplistic
of those reasons for determining the application of the techniques
being taught.
What
is usually emphasized (for equating symmetry),
is an equality (of
motion) between either
of the two sides (by the defender). What would be more accurate,
would be a singular
motion (performed by only one side), that will create an equivalent
response, regardless
of which side is being utilized by the aggressor.
To
add further confusion
to one's training, Taika is constantly frustrated by our
inability to motion either
arm in the (exact) same manner. It was because of this inability,
that Taika began to teach his
“single-side” defensive methodology . This
single-side manner is
the initially taught practice method (before having students, Taika
believed that everyone
should/could/would be able to do equivalent motions with either side). Once one has become proficient
in it's
implementation, the student can then
begin developing their non-dominant
side.
No comments:
Post a Comment