In addition to the
general guidelines, there are additionally some specific
preferences that we also attempt to adhere to. These were Regularly
voiced by Taika, and have since become the cornerstones of his
protective teachings.
"Size or Strength is not
Relevant to a Technique's Effectiveness"
"Utilize 3
Defensive Motions at Once"
"Avoid Moving directly to
the Rear"
"Hand Motions Work Best,
Above the Waist," (and)
"Leg Motions Work
Best, Below the waist."
"Always Square Your Body,
Towards Your Opponent"
"Learn Your Own
Weaknesses, In Order to Know Your Enemy's"
Students are initially
taught to “pre” determine the defensive motion that they will
utilize when they are confronted by an aggressor. That motion can be
orientated towards a submissive outcome, or a physically
damaging outcome. One's initial priority is to protect
themselves from receiving any (serious) injury. Once that is
accomplished, the students emphasis should be upon the
neutralization of the aggressor.
This can come in the form
of a physical inability to continue their own aggression, or a
mental change of attitude/intent. The preferred
neutralization would be the attitude change/reassessment.
Unfortunately this is usually achieved only following a physical
demonstration of one's defensive capability.
With that in mind, we
practice the demonstrated technique's with the previously listed
guidelines being applied to them.
Size or Strength is not
Relevant to a Technique's Effectiveness
With
this in mind, it will force the student to study and understand each
techniques strength's and weaknesses. When an opponent is (obviously)
using strength to deliver their attack, the student should
study/understand the inherent weaknesses to that attacking method and
counter by applying their own defensive strikes/manipulations to
those weaknesses.
Utilize 3 Defensive
Motions at Once
This
is commonly misinterpreted to mean “applied” at the same time.
Though possible, to do so, that is more often than not
impractical to physically perform (or plan on). It's
fairly simple to utilize “2” motions at once (with practice),
then utilize an immediate follow-up. This is also (easily) performed
by initially using a single (limb) technique, followed by 2
additional applications (1 hand/arm, 1foot). Either instance will
provide the “3 motions” required.
The
logic Oyata used for this, was that anyone can stop/prevent a single
motion, two is more difficult and three are extremely difficult to
prevent.
Avoid Moving directly
to the Rear
Although
this should be obvious,
it isn't (to many people). It's natural to move away
from a physical threat, unfortunately it's common to move directly
away (rearward) from that threat. Movement to one's rearward side, is
the slowest direction
that one is able to move towards (this is clearly illustrated in
class).
By
moving at an angle (to
either side) rearward, is more effective (being out of line
with the standard aggressive
technique) than moving directly rearward, and is just, if not faster, than moving directly rearward.
Hand Motions Work
Best, Above the Waist
Leg Motions Work Best,
Below the waist
Another
one that would seem to
be obvious, yet isn't. As with anything, it requires
training/practice to not attempt to use one's hand's to
deflect/strike an opponent's legs (when an aggressor is using them to
attempt a strike upon you, using their own). (strangely?) the same is
true with some hand/arm motions. I've witnessed instructor's
attempting to teach students to use their leg's to “kick” an
aggressor's hands/arm's (as a “defensive tactic”?). Aside from
being impractical, inefficient and ineffective it also requires too
much training (even if it could
be forced) to be effective.
Always Square Your
Body, Towards Your Opponent
This
is both a tactical and a strategic mandate. Tactically, by remaining
square (to the opponent), you display no side preference's (Left or
Right). You also provide the most efficient way to deliver force (via
strikes) using either arm. Strategically, this allows the defender to
utilize either arm without displaying your preference to an
aggressor.
Learn Your Own
Weaknesses, In Order to Know Your Enemy's
Human
bodies are all similar. There may be aesthetic differences, but the
anatomy remains similar (enough) between any/all humans to be
considered “common”. If one's own body has a location that is
sensitive (to pressure/impact), the odds are good that the same
location is susceptible on other person's as well. The “rule”
being that “If it hurts upon you, it will likely hurt on an
aggressor”
Any of these could be expounded upon in greater detail (and I have done so with most of them on this blog). More importantly, a student should recognize that each are an important facet to the implementation of what is being shown to them. Each of them represent potential technique failures (that could have been avoided), and should have been addressed in the students training sessions.
Though most appear to be (little more than) common sense, they each illustrate concepts that should be closely examined.
Any of these could be expounded upon in greater detail (and I have done so with most of them on this blog). More importantly, a student should recognize that each are an important facet to the implementation of what is being shown to them. Each of them represent potential technique failures (that could have been avoided), and should have been addressed in the students training sessions.
Though most appear to be (little more than) common sense, they each illustrate concepts that should be closely examined.
No comments:
Post a Comment