I'm certain that (many) individual's read the supplied "title" (to this blog) and thought that I had somehow changed my feelings about "sparring". Well no, I haven't (this is a different aspect of "physical contact", LOL).
Students
will often negate the importance that physical contact has, in
relation to the reactions that it can/will create. Too often their
emphasis is only in regards to the results attained from “strikes”
that are being attempted (and whether those strikes are successful or
not).
Much
“to-do” is made of late, regarding “kakae” strikes.
Oyata (eventually) had us incorporating them into nearly every
kata motion. They were often described as being “extra” strikes,
but they more often only made arm motion that wasn't being
(defensively) productive, to now serve a purpose in one's
defensive tactics.
Much
of this is a result of students having the “Left (then) Right”
mentality while applying their defensive motions. Oyata emphasized
the use of both arms for defensive applications
(simultaneously).
The
new student will commonly believe that an impact (punch/kick
etc.) will cause injury (pain, or possibly even damage) to the
location of that impact, and “that” will be the summation of the
“results” for implementing an (any) impact/strike. The Problem
with this belief, is that it is an extremely limited
perspective. To expand that perspective, we have students perform the
“Finger Pressure” exercise. This exercise is only used to
demonstrate the relationships between different area's of the body,
whether those areas are being directly (IE.”physically”)
effected or not.
The
Tori should assume a “fighting” stance, with one leg
forward and will then extend one arm forward (commonly the
opposite arm from the forward leg, IE. A “reverse” punch).
Holding their “punching” hand stationary (and extended), the Uke
will then gently press against one side of the Tori's (extended)
“fist”. The Tori should attempt to maintain the location of their
extended fist (while the Uke is applying this pressure).
As
the Uke is applying this pressure, the Tori should note the locations
over the entire body, that respond to that pressure (in order
to resist it).
These locations will change, as the (Uke's)
applied pressure changes (in regards to the direction “top/bottom
and either side”of the Tori's extended fist). There
will also be variations in those responses, depending on where the
(Uke's) pressure is being applied upon the Tori's entire arm
(inside/outside, upper/lower, above/below the elbow, ETC.).
This
exercise is intended to raise the student's awareness of the physical
relationships that exist throughout the entire body (although we may
not be aware of them at any particular time). Through that
awareness, the student will become more attentive for which locations would
provide greater results through their utilization. Many of these
could (mistakenly) be considered to be “kyusho” locations, but more
accurately they should be considered “Atemi” points.
One
of the more common arguments presented (in regards to the utilization
of these locations/points) is the ability for them to be struck
during a confrontation. Obviously this is a legitimate concern, and
requires practice for their utilization during a confrontation.
One
of the things that Oyata showed (to aid in this), was the practice of
multiple contact. When one hand is in contact with an
aggressor (anywhere upon their body), the second hand will be more
accurate in it's attempt at achieving it's intended contact location.
This
can be demonstrated by having the tori place one hand (anywhere) upon
the uke (their body, arm, anywhere). Then have the tori
(quickly) “place” (not “hit”) their knuckles (of their
striking hand) upon the uke in the desired location. This
subliminal “reference” will make the tori's attempts
successful (more often) and with far greater accuracy (than
when no additional contact exists). This is commonly taught in
regards to Oyata's tenet of “2 hand” technique application.
Being
that what is commonly being practiced is a (very) “physical”
skill-set, it is easy for a student to fall into the belief that
“strength” is the dominant factor in deciding the success or
failure for an application.
Whether one (actually) has a
strength advantage (during a confrontation) becomes less
relevant when the natural strengths and weaknesses of the body
are understood (and it is understood how to exploit them to one's
advantage).
The
more relevant factor for these locations, is in regards to the
direction of the strikes implementation (upon those
locations). That (of course) is yet another “branch” of Oyata's
methodology and a student's study/research.
No comments:
Post a Comment