Over the years, I have
often wondered why it was that individual's (Martial arts practitioner's in this case) have found it necessary to study a
multitude of systems?
I realize that to many,
the accumulation of numerous “black-belts” is (somehow?) an
indicator of acquired knowledge, but it's usually meant the
exact opposite to myself.
Having had experience in
several systems myself, it became readily apparent that continuing in
that pursuit would be pointless (after having studied with
Taika). But then again, not everyone is seeking the same thing (from
their studies).
My only concern/interest
was in personal defensive/combative tactics (that were applicable in
the situation that I lived within). I was also (only) interested in
the “unarmed” aspects of that training (in regards to the “armed”
perspective, I utilize a Glock 21).
I find it difficult to
accept the reasons (commonly) given, for the study of multiple
systems. The most common, is the perception/belief of additional
combative knowledge being acquired. Though for this to be accurate,
this would mean that your initial (as well as any subsequent)
system/s that were studied, were (in fact) lacking in
sufficient information/abilities to fulfill the requirements being sought (when they were supposedly being studied).
Now if that were
the case, then why would one retain any obligation/commitment to
those previously studied systems? (seeing that they were lacking
in whatever the individual was seeking/requiring). Yet, it seems to
be important (to these individual's) that everything they ever
studied/attended be listed upon their resume.
It was in this regard
that I abandoned Shito-Ryu, It didn't contain the instruction
that I was seeking (nor did I agree with the combative methodology
that was being taught/associated with it).
Over the years we have had
numerous individual's who have studied with us for a only short time.
Most often their interest was in Tuite. It quickly became
obvious that what they had been calling “tuite” (in their
previously studied system), in fact wasn't. In (almost)
every case, the individual would only study with us for a few months,
before disappearing (which in several instances, we would then hear how they were then “teaching” tuite to whomever). A few months of
study is entirely insufficient to learn (much less teach)
the correct application of Taika's tuite technique's.
When I see that someone
has listed a number of different “systems” (that they have supposedly earned a Yudansha ranking in), the next thing that
I note, is their age. I then divide the the age of the practitioner (-10, I don't consider anything learned age 5-10 to be of
any practical value) by the number of different systems being claimed as
having been studied. This provides me with better idea of how many years have
(possibly) been used for the study of those (additionally) claimed arts.
I know numerous
individual's who have (far more)
multiple rankings in multiple systems/methodologies. When queried,
none could demonstrate or even list the differences between them
(except in a very obviously vague way). So why bother? unless
you have ton's of time to kill, (not to mention money) the
study of multiple systems is a waste of time.
Additionally, it makes
you appear to be a half-ass practitioner. The more certificates
and rankings in multiple systems you have, basically displays how big
of a douche-bag you are IMO (or how much extra money you have to waste).
If it were true
(that there were only minor differences between styles), then what
would be the purpose for having those rankings in different
styles/systems? (and wouldn't that be evidence of the hubris of the
individual who chose to increase their “certificate count”)
If/when one (instead)
chooses to consider that there are differences, then why
would one choose to (attempt to) learn a high number of these
different systems? They were developed with the idea that each
were superior to the others, they were not intended to be used
in unison, yet people are constantly attempting to do so.
Each was also intended to
be learned over a longer period of time (than is apparently being
spent on them by those individual's), and with their own motions
utilized in conjunction with them.
It would appear that
every Tom, Jane and Herald seems to believe that “they” are going
to be able to exceed the results of those systems that have
been in place for decades.
More often than not, All
they do is put together a confusing collection of techniques, that
rarely work together, and more often only rarely will work for the
majority of students. The most common resultant “system” is only
applicable for a very select “type/size/situation” (of student).
That, is the beauty of
the “traditional” systems, each is adaptable for the
majority of students (regardless of their individual application
principles). If those individual's (with the multiple rankings) had
actually “studied” (any of) those systems, they would have
discovered their own failings (and discontinued any further
indulgence in that futile exercise).
They obviously didn't
make any grand “discoveries”, or they would have stopped
searching. Yet, they insist on listing every one of those
failed/inadequate systems (they had to of been
failures, other wise why continue to learn yet another
one?).
Unfortunately, in the
case of Ryukyu kempo (the system that Taika used to teach when he first
came to the U.S.), Taika often handed out provisional Yudansha Ranks
to students who (only) attended “seminars” (in the presumption
that they would continue their study with him). Very few
actually did so. In fact most only used those
certificates/ranking to “Pad” their own resumes.
One did so to the point
of causing Taika to change what he was teaching, and begin to
teach his own system/methodology (after that person began also
using the “generic” Ryukyu Kempo name). That individual also made
numerous (false) claims of having received “personal” instruction
(from Taika) to justify his nonsensical teachings.
For many years it was
rare to find Yudansha who had (actually) risen through the entire
kyu-rank system before receiving a Yudansha rank from Taika. Most had only been presented with a Yudansha certificate based upon their (supposed) ranking within their prior system.
Now, "Dan-Ranks" have very little meaning to them (they seem to be handed out to anyone who can/will pay the extravagant prices that are placed upon them). Looking over the internet, it would appear that having a 7th Dan (or higher) rank is a very commonplace occurrence.
Having met numerous individual's (who claim these ranks), I take all with (not) a "grain" (but a bucket) of salt. These days the only thing that having a "higher" ranking examples, is that the individual has had the money to blow on purchasing that rank (or they started their own "system", which they then awarded themselves that higher ranking). Unless one is planning on opening a public (store-front) school/dojo, having that higher rank (for "P-R" purposes) amounts to nothing. It's only the illiterate in the subject who are fascinated/impressed by those higher rankings.
It used to be that the monthly student attendance fee's were where instructor's made their money, now it's in testing fee's. The average cost of receiving a Shodan rank, is between $150.00-$250.00 (and higher). This often doesn't include the cost of the testing event which the testing is conducted at (an additional $150.00-$250.00+).
From everything that I have observed over the years, attaining a higher rank only amounts to how much intimidation one can then wield among those of lower rank (at least within that system, since nobody really has any acknowledgement for any other system's ranking, LOL).
From everything that I have observed over the years, attaining a higher rank only amounts to how much intimidation one can then wield among those of lower rank (at least within that system, since nobody really has any acknowledgement for any other system's ranking, LOL).
When I first began to study from Taika, he would tell us "don't start a (store front) dojo, to make a living". He said that you should (first) have a real job (to pay your bills), only then can you (properly) be able to teach "Te" to students.
Those who taught on a full-time basis (in lieu of having a real job), were often forced to offer/include nonsensical instruction (i.e. "karate-aerobics", "sparring classes", "TCM" etc.) none of which had any relevance to the learning of "Te", but would generate extra income to pay their bills.
I understand full and well why they do so, I just don't agree with it.
Those who taught on a full-time basis (in lieu of having a real job), were often forced to offer/include nonsensical instruction (i.e. "karate-aerobics", "sparring classes", "TCM" etc.) none of which had any relevance to the learning of "Te", but would generate extra income to pay their bills.
I understand full and well why they do so, I just don't agree with it.
No comments:
Post a Comment