I have engaged in numerous discussions
(more accurately "debates") concerning the use of strikes,
delivered upon the arms of an aggressor. The “argument”(?)
against their use, is commonly accompanied by the person's claim that
they have received (numerous) strikes (being made upon their arm's),
and have suffered no “ill effects” (that would prevent
their continued use of them during a confrontation).
To myself, this claim is equivalent to
those who state that they have never been “taken to the
ground” (during a confrontation), so working on “ground
tactics” is a waste of time. I could (easily) make the
argument that those individuals have never had "effective"
arm strikes utilized upon them, but it is more productive to define
the expectation's for those types of strikes (than to argue
one's presumed vulnerability to them).
The majority of utilized strikes
(intentionally delivered to/upon the arm's of an opponent) are
a rare occurrence. This is (commonly) seen regardless of the
"style" being taught. Student's are often more
concerned with striking the "face/body" of their opponent.
This is seen whether the strike is delivered by an aggressor, or by
the defender (during a confrontation). Achieving an effective
delivery of these types of strikes requires a greater degree of
accuracy with their delivery and the student's understanding of how
those strikes should be implemented.
If/when a “defender” chooses to not
“close” with their aggressor (for whatever reason), that
aggressor will (commonly) attempt to strike the defender by using
their arm's. Those person's with “longer” arm's will often focus
upon the use of their own arm's as well (to implement their attempted
strikes).
If one's arms are shorter (than
their opponent's), the “best/easiest” remaining option, is
to focus their own strikes being made upon the arms of
that opponent. “Random” placement of those strikes will rarely
achieve any productive results. When those strikes are (accurately)
placed upon those locations that are vulnerable (to being
struck), the opponent's use of that arm will diminish (if not
cease). Although an immediate cessation of (that arm's)
use is not always achieved, the delivery of a single (if not
continuous) accurate placement of those strikes will diminish
the aggressor's continued use of (or effectiveness with)
that arm. It will (often) cause that aggressor to (either)
change tactics (ceasing to “strike”), or modify their
method of attack. This will (often) equate to then “grabbing” the
Tori/student. This can often negate the aggressor's (presumed)
superiority (if not their greatest threat) in the
confrontation. With the application of the defender's strikes (having
been made upon the aggressor's arm's), despite the aggressor's
belief's, those “arm-strikes” have diminished the
aggressor's use of them (their arm's), and have reduced their
abilities with any continued use of them.
For myself, I utilize few (if
any) strikes that are placed upon the “body” (of an aggressor).
The majority of the strikes that “I” utilize, are made upon the
arm's, legs and (occasionally) the neck. I have (almost) never been
involved in an altercation with someone who was smaller than
myself. Though being (comparatively) "tall", I am not
(physically) large, (nor “strong”). This has equated to my
confrontations being with individual's who were (both) larger
and stronger than myself. The ability to use superior size and
strength has not been an option. As a result, I have
focused on the use of the applications (taught to me by Oyata) being
made upon the weaknesses (or vulnerable locations) of my
opponent's. When I state that strikes delivered upon the “arm's”
(of an aggressor), will affect their use of/for them, I can do
so with the experience that I have had with my own use
of them.
When people have asked (within our
classes, whether by regular student's or by attending guests) the
(often easily accomplished) use of these types of (arm)
strikes can be easily demonstrated. No, they are not (or at
least are rarely) "fight ending" applications. But
they can definitely create significant (detrimental) effects
upon an aggressor's abilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment