Well, my associate has returned from
his attendance of a seminar that he was invited to teach at recently.
The seminar was hosted by the Ryukenkan Dojo in New Zealand. From the
postings I've seen on Facebook (and the comments included with
them) it appears that they were pleased with what was shown. The
intent of the seminar was to (personally) introduce and demonstrate
the numerous aspects of Oyata Te's methodology to this school, and to
provide answers to the (numerous) questions that they had in regards
to it's study and practice.
Although this school had prior
experience with (several) systems that taught similar
methodologies, they apparently were interested in comparing what they
had previously learned with the instruction that we are able to
provide. I've (at yet) recieved no correspondance (myself) from them
(to directly know their opinion on what was shown to them) but I did
see a notation by one of the attendee's (in regards to the seminar)
and my associate tells me that he recieved very favorable feedback
while he was there.
Fortunately (for myself), my
associate video recorded various pieces of the seminar, mainly for
our own reference in regards to any future presentations (whether
with them or with others) so I have a feel for how they are
inclined to perform certain motions (and how that material had been
shown to them).
I believe the original format (of the
seminar) was intended to be in regards to weapon's training
(?), but my associate stated that he gravitated towards Tuite
practice (from the feedback that he was receiving from various
student attendee's). I was told that there was some discussion
(with the instructors) in regards to differences in how Kata was to
be practiced, but I'm (at this time) unclear as to the extend of
those conversations.
From an "instruction"
perspective, I'm curious to review the video that Lee recorded (to
observe the general reactions by the attendee's) to what was shown,
and how well they comprehended the shown material. He was informed
that some (1 or 2) of them may "drop by" this summer
to attend our class (to see what "our" classes are like)
which should be enjoyable. Our classes are (definitely) conducted
differently (from the average "karate" class).
Though having practiced similar
methodology's, I found it interesting to hear of the (numerous)
differences that existed between those systems (and our own).
Although those (other) systems presumably came from a similar (if not
the same) source (I.E. Oyata), the presenters of that
information (from those other systems) seem to have often came to
different conclusions (as to what was being provided by my
associate).
I feel obliged to note that I have not
communicated (directly) with any of those attendee's (of this
seminar), so I can only relay what was told to me by an (obviously)
"Biased" source (my associate). Dispite that bias, I have
full faith in that source, so I expect that what he says is
completely accurate.
We'll have to see if (any) of those
individual's "drop by" (this summer), and/or I can receive some direct feedback on their opinion of the provided seminar.
No comments:
Post a Comment