tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8262188083303218167.post4701535681460639101..comments2023-04-21T13:13:04.607-05:00Comments on Tuite Jutsu (Personal training/teaching methodologies in Te): Describing Technique ApplicationsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8262188083303218167.post-51558390987261773902011-08-19T15:15:04.087-05:002011-08-19T15:15:04.087-05:00"This is an incorrect methodology, the uke..."This is an incorrect methodology, the uke's motions/reactions have to be considered in any technique's application."<br /><br />I totally agree with you. It's a major failing of many who believe they are teaching application of technique. On the same note, I think it is very important for the Uke to "react" appropriately. In practicing the technique, I (the Tori) may not actually hit you (the Uke) hard enough to do damage, inflict pain, or otherwise make you react, however you should know this and respect my control enough to respect our training together and “react” as if I had hit you hard enough to make you react.<br /><br />The same goes for practicing any technique. If I’m practicing a high block, as my Uke please do not punch to the side of my head – punch me in the nose!<br /><br />Thanks for the reply. Again, I’m really enjoying this blog.FossMaNO1https://www.blogger.com/profile/02824534576462502026noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8262188083303218167.post-1538110985758674762011-08-18T18:46:10.785-05:002011-08-18T18:46:10.785-05:00“I think this blog might have been directed at me ...“I think this blog might have been directed at me (though that’s probably just my ego talking), especially if you look at one of our recent discussions under the Defensive Study article.”<br /><br /> Actually, not at all (I receive many “off-line” requests) yours was but one of many. Additionally, the technique which I referred to was more fully described in a previous blog, so I saw no need to re-hash that subject.<br /><br />“In our previous discussion, I was little perturbed that you refused to answer my question regarding countering a left vs. right hook punch. By not answering my question in even a general way I walked away from that conversation thinking that you either were an elitist who refused to share his “secrets,” or you thought my own experience was so shallow that I couldn’t possibly understand what you were talking about. Between the two I’m not sure which one is more annoying.”<br /><br /> LOL (“elitist”, and “secrets”), actually I thought I mentioned that the technique mentioned was posted in an earlier blog (maybe not?). Regardless, the technique mentioned is one which is designed to defend against in the opening motions in a confrontation. The “hook-punch” is a popular technique used (aggressively) in those situations. Though not nearly as effective as a straight (type of) punch, people are often more comfortable utilizing it (my guess, is that it provides a “feeling” of power in it's use?).<br /> Regardless, the technique I referred to is composed of (what most people would call) a Left-inward parry used simultaneously with a Right outside “block”, followed by the tori applying a Right hand/arm strike (that's the simplistic description). The motion also includes (what we call) a “straight-kick”, which additionally changes the dynamics of the aggressor's actions/motions. When instructing our student's or during a seminar, this explanation/description/demonstration entails (approx.) 2-2½ hour's. When put in writing, it constitutes a chapter in a book (10-20 pages?, I haven't finished writing it all out, LOL). <br /> Understand, I am in no way attempting to “blow you off” or belittle you, by not fully answering your question (and I certainly haven't done so with the above explanation). I am to some degree, a perfectionist (or just “anal”, LOL). I don't like providing half-ass answers that can be misconstrued.<br /> Though many system's do use similar motions, that utilize similar names, it is those minor differences that can decide whether a technique work's, or fails. I also find that student's/observer's, tend to focus on the tori's motions (for providing all the answers to a techniques application). This is an incorrect methodology, the uke's motions/reactions have to be considered in any technique's application.Openhandhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14744464788866986742noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8262188083303218167.post-50948048531891653202011-08-18T16:01:48.788-05:002011-08-18T16:01:48.788-05:00I think this blog might have been directed at me (...I think this blog might have been directed at me (though that’s probably just my ego talking), especially if you look at one of our recent discussions under the Defensive Study article.<br /><br />I completely understand not wanting to go into detail on the specifics of techniques (you’re right, there are too many variations/tweaks to account for in writing) however it is sort of frustrating not to get at least a high-level overview of a technique. I started following this blog because I was impressed with what you had to say. I read to learn and I saw this blog as a chance to learn something new, or at least a chance to gather a new perspective on what I am already practicing. When someone refuses to elaborate, however, I become frustrated.<br /><br />I think maybe it be helpful to keep in mind that a good number of the folks who read this blog have some amount of training themselves—give us a little credit for being able to interpret your intent if you do decide to give a brief description of a technique. No one reputable would expect a full understanding/mastery of any technique described in writing. If I say “perform a high block,” a Japanese karate practitioner will perform said maneuver differently than an Okinawan karate practitioner who will in turn perform it differently than a Kung Fu practitioner or even a Muay Thai practitioner. That’s fine—only in very rare instances is a specific (down to the nitty-gritty detail) execution of the technique required to understand the overall effect being performed. Going back to my high block example, even within an Okinawan style there are several different high blocks depending on the level of training you’re at (e.g., Kyu rank vs. Dan). Still, the overall gist of the high block is to deflect an incoming punch in an upwards direction (the nuances between levels of training can add or alter this overall effect, but I think you understand my point).<br /><br />In our previous discussion, I was little perturbed that you refused to answer my question regarding countering a left vs. right hook punch. By not answering my question in even a general way I walked away from that conversation thinking that you either were an elitist who refused to share his “secrets,” or you thought my own experience was so shallow that I couldn’t possibly understand what you were talking about. Between the two I’m not sure which one is more annoying.<br /><br />When all is said and done, however, I still enjoy this blog and have found myself intrigued by your thoughts. Many times I find myself thinking, “I knew I wasn’t the only one who thought that!” while at other times I’ll sit back and examine your point of view and find it not to be so contrary to what I’ve already been taught after all—it’s just presented in a different way. I haven’t found anything I disagree with yet (except perhaps for a portion of your article on sparring, though I haven’t thought it through enough to form my thoughts into anything coherent).<br /><br />So, thank you! Keep up the thought-provoking efforts!FossMaNO1https://www.blogger.com/profile/02824534576462502026noreply@blogger.com